@hbkazemi33@MebFaber People need to understand how HF high water marks work. Presumably he needs to recoup that 67% drawdown before he can collect fees again. A 2/3 drawdown means be needs to be up 200% from here
Agree, but think it will take some time. Degrossing is forced, regrossing is a choice.
Right now, it's hard to say this is more than short covering. But time will tell.
https://t.co/Rhep7Mlpj9
Those who missed the *AI trade* can now load up on quality stocks when they're down 40-50% from the highs.
Highly probable this selloff will turn out to be a major buying opportunity.
Yesterday's AI rally looked like short covering, not a change in trend. The names are still below resistance and still making lower highs.
Positioning is the bigger issue: people de-risked, and rebuilding conviction takes longer than covering a short does.
3/ Drelles’ logic: the market was changing, and the people with the most experience had the most to unlearn. He wanted the guy with conviction and no habits from the last cycle — he compared it to why armies send teenagers into battle.
@MebFaber@trengriffin Literally the first rule is to not leverage volatile, mark-to-market assets. There is a reason most of the levered pod portfolios have low net exposure and right stops
@modestproposal1 Everyone here worships at the feet of Druck, PTJ, etc and they all have said, repeatedly, they look at price action first and fundamentals maybe second.
@johnarnold It's a legit question. I can remember back to the 1980s and people worrying about Reagan and defense spending and it has never seemed to matter. I'm sure it will one day, but 40 years is a long time